Rathnakar Shetty sir with specific purpose of delivring jusrice to the common man joined Police Department. For “Haves“ there are so many means to obtain justice. For “Have Nots“, to get justice in a criminal justice system police station is only a first step in a ladder for justice. Common man always expects a fair and dare SHO to readdress their grievances in the Police Station. We can call any police officer as fair only when that officer perform his duty as per his conscious. That officer should not wavering towords push and pull factor. Of course, there are disturbing factor while an Police Officer taking judicious discion but that officer always keep in mind disturbing factors can be a temporary hassle and it can be over come by a strong belief on the path of executing true spirit of law. “Sathya Meva Jayathe “. Is the slogan of administration.
The achieve the goal of delivering justice to a common man by Rathnakar Shetty sir is from the supportive hierarchy and coercive environment. Equally, circumstances also supportive to his descion making process as SHO. Of course, acting as per conscious is delivers immense satisfaction to once soul. in a police action achieving of goal decided on the merits of the decision and the prompt action on the series of cases reported and result of action action taken by an officer as per his conscious and the satisfaction of the victims . For better understanding recollecting of land mark cases reported, disposed and judgement delivered is very important in a criminal justice system. Every police officer should believe that each complaint is an opportunity to him to put his effort to explore truth behind the First Information Report. Every clue is an divine message in the path of exploring truth. Following few landmark cases wherein the honest effort of an investigating officer in exploring the truth while on investigation for getting justice to the victim
Deceased soul enlighten you and give you an opportunity to be an good detective officer in the path of delivering criminal justice .
Wherever Rathnakar Shetty sir worked as SHO, information of natural death of an teen age boy/girl: after spot inspection, collection of material by Rathnakar Shetty sir natural death investigation leads to homicide and murderer of deceased and all accused got convicted. ex: kalkere murder case of three year old boy or serial rape & killing of teenage girls in muntap village of bannergatta police station, rape & killing of teenage girls in karpoor village of Attibele Police Station or drowning became murder case of weavers colony of Sampigehalli Police Station etc are the typical cases in which Rathnakar Shetty sir strongly believed that deceased soul enlighten him and gave him an opportunity to be an good detective officer in the path of delivering criminal justice to the deceased.
Deceased soul got the right to punish the wrong doer by availing the opportunity of Investigation by an fair Officer
Normally while delivering criminal justice to the deceased family, on convection to the accused along with imprisonment court orders for compensation to the deceased / victim . If suppose none of the deceased nor the accused family came forward to claim the deceased/ accused, then normally the question arises whom to compensate? In a typical case of arson and murder of a women in daylight street in Thanisandra of Sampigehalli Police Station, either the deceased family to receive the dead body nor the accused family to accept the onus came forward. Just because both accused and deceased of that case abandoned their children in their village and both of them living together in Thanisandra, quarreled each other and man killed women by arson. Even after conviction family of both accused and deceased did not turned up. Rathnakar Shetty sir himself criminated the deceased and send the accused to the jail and got him convicted inspite of legal aid to the accused. This is a typical case to show that deceased soul got the right to punish the wrong doer by availing the opportunity of Investigation by an fair Officer like Rathnakar Shetty sir.
Nature too got the right to punish the wrong doeres and protect itself by availing the opportunity of an fair, effective Officer
The true spirit of the constitution derived from “Magna-Carta” principal that every living being should live freely and it should be controlled in accordance with law. It is the fundamental liability of every one to protect the environment for the survival of living being. Wild life too got the right to live in the forest. If forest it self was encroached by grabbers/mining mafia then at least executive should pro actively act. If entire executive slept over the matter for more then of a century then the only officer like an Rathnakar Shetty sir who understand the effect of human-wild conflict, explore the provision of law to protect forest and wild life. Rathnakar Shetty sir when he is working as SHO he noticed running of mining mafia in and around National Park Bannerghatta. The judgement of apex court in connection to north-east forest i.e” No non forest activity within the forest area” came to rescue of Rathnakar Shetty sir. He pro actively supported the forest officials and registered theft case against encroachers and gave full protection to rubber walling of thousands of acers of forest land and wild animals are rooming freely now. This is a typical case to show that Nature too got the right to punish the wrong doer and protect itself by availing the opportunity of an fair Officer like Rathnakar Shetty sir.
Control over social evil, exploiters of poverty and busting of international racket of converting minor boy in to Hizra: reconstruction of boy and rehabitation- a humanistic approach to victims of exploiters.
Nature creates man, women and third gender. if international racket of converting minor boy in to Hizra? then, only officer like Rathnakar Shetty sir can unearth and burst such racket in India. It all started when poor couple approached him in Sampigehalli Police Station to get back their kidnapped boy from the clutches of gang of Hizra’s. Surpraisingly their minor son forcefully converted as Hizra by organized gang. During the course of investigation Rathnakar Shetty sir made know to the world that international racket fully operative in the globe to exploit the foreign fund for HIV prevention in the name of artificial Hizra’s. Foreign fund floods to the country to protect victims of prostitution. When required victims of prostitution was not available then poor minor boys became victims of gang and by force these gangs by following the mode of operation, identify the poorest teenage boy, selectively kidnap the boy and their forceful amputation and forceful conversion as Hizra’s and use them as victims of prostitutes and in the pretext of helping hijras divert the foreign aid in favor of gang . All the accused including financier, surgeon and other gang members arrested and being investigating officer shetty sir arranged the reconstruction surgery of a child and in the course of investigation several such boys rescued in India was restored back to their parents.
Involve police-friendly Corporate companies in crime prevention activities
It is the liability of every citizen/industry/company to prevent the crime. Industrialization reciprocally contributes to the increase in road accidents.it is their responsibility too prevent crime. One such initiative taken by Rathnakar Shetty sir effort to Involve police-friendly Corporate companies make them in crime prevention activities. One of the result of such effort is gardening in between Hosur-Electronic city National High way by Electronic city Industial Association
Protect Law and Law Protects You: Rathnakar Shetty's Triumph Over False Accusations
Protect law and law will protect you. It is the success story of shetty sir inspite of the efforts made by the criminals by tarnishing the image by making use negative ecosystem. but it is temporary. all the accused who made an effort to rathnakar shetty sir failed because Justice always prevails. Follow the due process of law. Justice always prevails over efforts by accused people to derail law enforcement efforts made by police officers like Rathnakar Shetty sir. He executed the law in accordance with its spirit. Efforts by accused people went in vain due to judicial decisions in favor of Rathnakar Shetty sir and police officers.
When Rathnakar Shetty working as Station House Officer in Cubbon Park Police Station as Police Inspector few syndicate members of organized gang headed by one accused, KSRTC driver, made an effort to tarnish the image of police officer to derail the process of law.
It all started when Rathnakar Shetty promoted on 16-1-2004 as police inspector and executing the law in the limits of Cubbon Park police station in the year 2006. The only allegation made by this gang against Rathnakar Shetty is that he filed charge sheet on 10-6-2005 as sub inspector of nelamangala police statiom in connection to the accident dated: 08-08-2003 occurs near Chikkabidarakallu between KSRTC bus bearing registration No.KA13-F978 and a lorry. On the same day of the occurrence of the accident, complaint was registered against KSRTC driver before the Nelamangala police station in Crime No.570 of 2003 for offences punishable under Sections 279, 337 and 338 of the IPC. KSRTC driver, the accused after involved in the accident without facing criminal case in the Nelamangala court, he and syndicate members of organized gang exploited the opportunity by availing the criminal justice system veiled allegation against police officer. Surprisingly accused driver was enlarged on nonbailable warrant. Admittedly he accepts that he committed an offence and he is not ready to appear in Nelamangala Court.
In a criminal justice system for every common citizen there is procedure established to readdress their grievances. Of course even for the person facing criminal charges is also may readdress their grievances in accordance with law in a platform and there is a proper forum prescribed. If accused person By overlapping procedure and the accused. When the accused encroaching the common citizen forum then at least mechanism should alert the accused to follow the due procedures and should avoid miscarriage of justice. But in Rathnakar Shetty matter nine of the institutional body followed the law. Rathnakar Shetty, just because working in cubbon park police station, accused misused the machinery and he is able to take the shelter under KSRTC brand and through KSRTC accused registered a case against station house officer by filing false allegation that as on the date of 10-06-2005 Rathnakar Shetty was the PSI of Nelamangala Police Station and filed charge sheet against KSRTC driver. The KSRTC and legal team should have been examine the procedure established for an accused person to readdress grievances. Rather taking departmental action against their driver or atleast by keeping the interest on the genuine victims they shold have been take the logical conclusion of the Nelamangala case rather exploring the option beneficial to their driver instead they bounced on the police officer without verifying the facts of the case advertised the accused say in a social print and other plantform. KSRTC while tarnishing the police officer gone to the extent to deprived the benefit to the family died in the accident claiming that nobody was died in the accident. Then the stand taken by the KSRTC in favour of KSRTC was challenged bt Rathnakar Shetty then KSRTC admitted before the Apex Court the allegation against Rathnakar Shetty is false.
When entire mechanism failed, the judiciary, questioned the mechanism by raising the isuue and while ordering against the entire mechanism and judiciary ordered that, “The issue now would be, whether the KSRTC could complain of allegedly filing of a false charge sheet before a Court of law? ,”And answered negative on the issue and opined that,” Rathnkar Shetty who was at that point in time officer in charge of the police station at Nelamangala gets transferred on 16-01-2004 and reports to duties at Bangalore. On 10-06-2005, charge sheet comes to be filed against the accused, KSRTC driver in Crime No.570 of 2003 for the afore-quoted offences. The concerned Court registers C.C.No.313 of 2005. In the light of the proceedings impugned and nothing against the petitioner, as he was not even the officer from 16-01-2004, all these factors have been completely glossed over ,”.This is the example case of triumph of truth.
Sathya Meva Jayathe
White colour offence by negative echo system ; supressing facts; colouring the sequence; exploiting the procedure established ; highlighting negative over factual position-At the end judiciary will brimg the truth out
Fact is that as on 16-01-2004 Rathnakar Shetty is not the Police Sub-Inspector in Nelamangala Police Station Bengaluru District. Actually as on the day he was promoted and posted as police inspector in Bengaluru City. Can any prudent man believe, on prima-facie ,allegation of an accused that promoted Inspector came back as occupy the chair of Sub Inspector to Nelamanagala police station to file charge sheet after a lapse one and half years i.e 10.06.2025. Surprisingly entire bad echo system believed the version of the accused driver. All the mechanism supported only for reason the accused alleged against police officer and also believed that the document which was favoring Rathnakar Shetty, police officer was used against him contrary to the facts. Over a period of two decades the entire bad echo system never thought of genuine victim of accident. Once Judiciary ordered that noting against Rathnakar Shetty and all the development occurred after police officer transferred and sequence of event used against Rathnakar Shetty by suppressing the date of occurrence, judiciary said that “claim petitions are filed before the concerned Court in MVC from 28-07-2004 to 2006. “All the dates shows that it all happened only after Rathnkar Shetty transferred and nothing against him. If anything against him the accused should have been approached respective court instead the exploited echo system. Even statutory body forgotten the established procedure and allowed the bad echo system explore the option to tarnish the law enforcement authority judiciary opined that, “but the complaint should emerge from the Court, therefore, the procedure under Section 340 of the Cr.P.C. though is said to be followed in the case at hand, it is on the foundation of a complaint registered by the KSRTC not before the same Court, but before a different Court. The concerned Court ought to have complained of filing of a false charge sheet before it. It has admittedly not happened in the case at hand. Therefore, on a loosely laid foundation, superstructure of proceedings are built, which is bound to collapse”. Judiciary clearly slapped stricture against accused KSRTC driver and entire ecosystem. Judiciary also directed entire ecosystem to respect the spirit of law. The executive always keep the criminal justice system in its spirit. After filling FIR against accused and following the established procedure is nothing but the judicial proceedings. “The Apex Court has clearly held and interpreted the words “in relation to”. Therefore, if in the relation to a crime that was pending before the concerned Court, if a document is filed, it becomes custodia legis and if it is a false document, it is for that concerned Court to register the crime”. Against to Apex court order the KSRTC driver and ecosystem extended the availability of criminal justice system of common man to the accused driver and try to demoral the executive mechanism by registering and filing false complaint suppressing the faucal records.
Justice maybe delayed but never denied: Two decade procedure followed by the Police Officer ended in justice
Accused KSRTC driver by way of miss interpreting the law or misusing of echo system able to defer his appearance before the court for two decade. False allegation by the accused person against station house officer is very easy. Echo system never understand the sanctity of the complaint against station house officers. The government in its wisdom appoint station house officer by following the procedure established under law. Contrary accused person disturbed by the legal action always claims that procedure followed by the judicial / quasi-judicial bodies questionable. Accused forget procedure duly established. Accused by making use of shortcut method by exploiting the echo system available to the common man. Misused echo system for the short gain always tried to achieve their mis-deeds by way of suppressing the factual records. Accused and their echo system always tried to suppress pro executive action to do their duty in the true spirit of law. A true executive after respect of wisdom of government always perform their duty with the full faith on the constitution. Rathnakar Shetty is one among such a executive followed the constitution. Of course, temporarily there maybe a bad echo system prevail over pro-constitution echo system. At the end justice prevail over injustice. Accused KSRTC driver and his echo system gone to the extent of creation of document against died person in the accident as alive human being. When such allegation was made against Rathnakar Shetty by KSRTC driver and his hench man, Rathnakar Shetty to uphold the wisdom of the government approached up to Apex court of the country. Then KSRTC taken reverse view. Only after Apex court interfere then one person died in accident, subsequently they assured the court in hurry investigation is completed and asked the apex court to readdress the grievances before the lower Judiciary setup. While delivering judgment high court obtained that opined that, “The Apex Court noticing the KSRTC accepted that the matter was still at the stage of investigation, directed continuance of investigation and reserved liberty to the accused to challenge the charge sheet in the event it is filed. After the aforesaid order, comes the charge sheet as observed. Therefore, the petitioner then files an application seeking his discharge from the array of accused. The discharge application comes to be rejected by order dated 8-10-2021, against which, the petitioner prefers a revision petition before the Court of Sessions, which also comes to be rejected on 14-11-2022. It is therefore, the petitioner is before this Court in both these cases”. This judgment highlighted the effort of the bad echo system and statuary premier institutions through a veiled allegation against police officer and just kill the time and allow to continue the process more than two decade and once justice prevailed sleep over the matter without thinking about the victim compensation or punishing the KSRTC driver. Judiciary while delivering justice to Rathnakar Shetty highlighted how station house officer followed procedure in the police station, Lower court, Session court, High court, Supreme Court. Judiciary also while slapping the accused KSRTC driver and his echo system also highlighted how a false previous compliant can derail justice to the station house officer over two decades. Judiciary while pronouncing the judgment in favour Rathnakar Shetty proved justice delayed not delayed.
Misuse of constitutional body advantageous to the law breaker
Citizen of the country under the constitution can make use of constitution body to secure justice. If a accused facing arrest warrant from the trail court enlarged from 18 years tried to take shelter under constitutional body in spite of pendency of execution of warrant against him. Then question arises whether constitutional body should verify the antecedent of the person approaching body for justice or the person enlarged should be treated on par with common man. The echo system which supports the enlarged person during his effort to misuse of constitution body and malign the law enforcing officer, will also supports the constitution body and law enforcing officer once enlarged accused person proved guilty after long process of judicial scrutiny the intention of the enlarged person. Is there any accountability to the constitutional body for repairing the damage caused because of its misuse. Whether the officer, with spirit of law, while executing the official power face the echo system which knowingly / un knowingly support, in the beginning of the misuse of constitution body by the law breaker, till the end. Can the same officer do the same type of bounce back on the law breaker once that officer establishes that the law breaker is misused the constitutional body and the entire echo system?.
To answer citizen should know how a accused after enlarged on bail facing non bailable warrant continue his criminal activity and how station house officer like Rathnakar Shetty unearthed him and seized the items sent the report to the respective court and how the same accused not approaching the court, suppressing the facts approached other constitutional body and make use of the station house officer of that body and failed to established his case. When the accused approaches the echo system to curtail pro active operation of Rathnakar Shetty against the accused. The same accused person conspire with other accused person who were convicted by the CBI court in a passport court and exploited the social media for their favour. The echo system may / may not aware of the bad intention of accused but stood with him in the initial stage and once he failed the same echo system also forgot/ pardon the misdeed of the accused and such echo system which was supporting accused in the begging is also caught free in spite of the fact that their publicity proved to be wrong by the judicial scrutiny.
Case Study – II
These all are started when Rathnakar Shetty, working as Amruthahally police station, while performing is official duty, as a investigating officer through process following established under law seized many machineries which was alleged to be stolen from citizen. The information on the seized items were sent to jurisdictional court in this regard Rathnakar Shetty obtain the order the keep the seized items in premises of police station.
One absconding criminal who is alleged to be involved in different cases in the city including non bailable warrant from mico layout police station against him rather questing the seizer before the respective court approached station house officer Lokayuktha police station and filled a complainant alleging that the seizer made by the Rathnakar Shetty all being the public servants, working as Police Inspector, Amruthahalli Police station, Bengaluru City and Police Constable Sampigehalli Police Station, Bengaluru City respectively, hatched a criminal conspiracy to do an illegal act. His first compliant is said to be oral compliant before station house officer Lokayuthka police station. The very beginning act of the accused against Rathnakar Shetty, as per the judgment of court is illegal, “complainant approached the Lokayuktha Police. During the said visit, the Lokayuktha Police in order to get concrete material to register the case, have given voice recorder to the complainant to record the conversation. It is well settled that giving of voice recorder to record the conversation with respect to demand of bribe, does not constitute preliminary enquiry, rather it amounts to collecting the evidence against any person accused of and it vitiates the entire investigation”.
The judicial slap on the misuse of government machinery by the accused person is highlighted in the judicial judgment and all the action taken by Rathnakar Shetty as investigating officer was appreciated by the judiciary, “materials on record reveal that before 7.9.2011, 26. The materials on record reveal that 45 sewing machines found in Amruthahalli Police station were subjected to PF No.73/2011 & 74/2011 in Crime No.112/2010 and those sewing machines were recovered from the house of Hameed & Saleem Pasha, as per the confession statement of Hameed-accused in Crime No.112/2010. The Court has refused to grant permission to release those properties in favour of the owner. The accused No.1 was not competent and empowered to release the properties in favour of the complainant unless there is a Court order. The accused No.2 at the relevant point of time was neither working in Amruthahalli Police station nor under the control of accused No.1. Under the circumstances, the question of accused No.1 & 2 demanding bribe from the complainant for doing an official favour, legally & factually does not arise”. Judiciary ordered that the allegation of the accused person against police officer, “has miserably failed” in this case to designated accused failed to derile the process of law against him and the echo system which supported accused against police officer should answer for their misuse. Once again proved that, “Sathya Mayva Jayate”.